Between Enemies and Friends: Carl Schmitt, Melanie Klein and the Passion(s) of the Political

Authors

  • Isaac D. Balbus University of Illinois at Chicago

Abstract

Carl Schmitt’s claim to have demonstrated an unbreakable connection between sovereignty and the opposition between friends and enemies stands as an enduring challenge to the possibility of a politics that is free from in-group idealization and out-group demonization and the inevitably pernicious consequences that follow from this political-psychological split. In this paper I take up this challenge by relying on, and extending, the psychoanalytic assumptions of Melanie Klein to identify the common yet contingent psychological preconditions of this “Schmittian” connection, and thus to begin to clarify the conditions under which it could be broken. In locating what might be called the “relative truth” of Schmitt’s position, Klein turns out to be neither entirely an enemy nor entirely a friend of Carl Schmitt.

Downloads

How to Cite

Balbus, I. D. (2013). Between Enemies and Friends: Carl Schmitt, Melanie Klein and the Passion(s) of the Political. Theoria and Praxis: International Journal of Interdisciplinary Thought, 1(1). Retrieved from https://theoriandpraxis.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/theoriandpraxis/article/view/36911